Blake Griffin will not participate in more NBA All-Star Games than Tyler Hansbrough
Tell me I’m crazy.
I know, it sounds ridiculous, but let us think about it for a little bit before you knee-jerk react and call me nuts. I am not saying that Griffin is going to be a bust; I am also not saying that Hansbrough will be a star. All I am saying is that I think that if Griffin has what it takes to be a star in this league, so does Hansbrough. And, if Hansbrough has all the makings of a “bust,” why do we not say the same for Griffin?
What do people think Griffin has that Hansbrough does not?
- Freakish athleticism? – Yes, this is will concede this point without any argument. Griffin is a freak athlete and Hansbrough is not. Griffin is quicker, a better leaper, and just all-around more athletic. Period. No debate.
- Age? Again, I cannot debate this. It is a fact that Blake Griffin is two years younger than Tyler Hansbrough.
- Size? No. Actually, this is completely false. I was shocked about this too because I thought Griffin was a true 6’11” and Hansbrough would be lucky to measure 6’9″. But, as it turns out, Hansbrough measured one-half inch taller than Griffin at the official NBA combine. In fact, Hansbrough’s standing reach is a full two-plus inches higher than Griffin’s and is actually slightly higher than Amare Stoudemire’s. I always said that Hansbrough just isn’t big enough to play an NBA 4, but the way the league is going and the fact that Hansbrough’s standing reach is higher than Amare’s, I have completely gone back on that opinion.
- Motor? Okay, I have never actually heard someone say that Griffin has more “motor” than Hansbrough specifically, but I have heard all this talk about Griffin’s and very little about Hansbrough’s. Did anyone else watch the player that I watched at UNC for the past four years? Motor is what defined Tyler Hansbrough for four years.
- Collegiate success against elite competition? Yes, you will hear over and over again about how Griffin was the 2008-09 NCAA basketball Player of the Year–an honor that he undisputably deserved. But, how quickly we forget that Hansbrough was the 2007-08 Player of the Year. Also, Hansbrough finished second, behind Griffin, even though he battled through a couple minor injuries and was surrounded by a supporting cast that took a lot of the burden, and therefore statistics, off of him. Griffin was everything for Oklahoma–impressive, but also allowed him to accumulate statistics. And, “success against elite competition?” Well, Hansbrough is the ACC’s all-time leading scorer (arguably, the conference with the best basketball history). He made the first-team All-ACC all four years. He was first-team All-American three times (he made the second team as a freshman). Plus, he was the ACC’s Rookie of the Year in 2006, Player of the Year in 2008, and probably would have won Player of the Year again in 2009 if he had stayed healthy (instead, it went to his teammate, Ty Lawson).
- Basketball pedigree? Yes, Griffin comes from a basketball family. We all watching his brother play side-by-side with him at OU for the past two years. Well, has anyone ever heard of Ben Hansbrough? If not, you will. He is Tyler’s younger brother and played two years at Mississippi State before sitting out last year so that he can transfer to Notre Dame and finish his two years of eligibility. Hansbrough is well on his way to becoming a 1000-point scorer–possibly even before reaching his senior season. He averaged 10.4 points, 2.6 assists, and 3.9 rebounds as a shooting guard for the Bulldogs in ’07-08.
Now, what might Hansbrough have that tomorrow’s #1 draft choice does not?
- Desire? I am not ready to put Griffin down on this one, but it is clear that Hansbrough is a maniac on the court. Griffin is one of the most naturally gifted rebounders that I have ever watched on the collegiate level, and that is great, but Hansbrough gets rebounds with desire and heart. And, anyone who has ever played basketball knows that–on any level–rebounding is as much about desire as it is about ability. Though I like Griffin’s makeup and heart, I have absolutely NO questions about Hansbrough’s
- Leadership? Now, maybe this is not fair because we only saw Griffin as a freshman and sophomore with a mediocre supporting cast, but this consensus #1 pick got beat by Hansbrough’s UNC team in the Elite Eight this year, as the Tar Heels went on their way to winning a national title. Hansbrough was clearly the leader of the championship team. He was also the clear leader on a Final Four team in 2008 (as Griffin’s Sooners lost by 30 in the second round to Louisville) and an Elite Eight team (that should have made the Final Four) in 2007. Plus, as a freshman, he led a rebuilding UNC team to a #3 seed, before a surprise loss to eventual Final Four team George Mason. Now, would Griffin have those credentials if he stayed four years? Maybe, but we do not know. And, that point leads us straight into…
- Experience? Hansbrough played in 12 NCAA tournament games (winning 9, including one title), 10 ACC tournament games (winning 8, including two titles), and almost all of his team’s 64 ACC conference games over the course of his career (UNC was 50-14 in his 4 years, with three regular season titles and one second place finish). He has lived the “big game” for 4 years now. Griffin has played in some big games too, in his two years at OU, but the Big XII’s regular season (and even the conference tournament) cannot hold a candle to the intensity of every ACC game, regular season or tournament.
- Work ethic? Again, this is not a knock on Griffin. He probably has a strong work ethic, but do we know that for sure? I think we can say definitively that Hansbrough will work his tail off, at all times, and has already shown (wait for it) that he can take a weakness and turn it into a strength simply by working at it…
- Jump shot? This is the big advantage Hansbrough has over Griffin heading into the NBA. Can Griffin develop a jumper? Maybe. But, Hansbrough already has. With hard work in the offseasons, particularly the one leading up to his senior year, Hansbrough basically doubled the range on his jump shot. Plus, he took his free-throw percentage from 73% as a freshman (already pretty solid) to a remarkable 85% as a senior, including a streak of 28 consecutive made FTs. Griffin, on the other hand, has basically no range outside of 8 feet, and shot free throws at an alarming 59% in both his freshman and sophomore seasons. Unless you are a ferocious, once-in-generation defender like Ben Wallace or a physical god like Shaq or Dwight Howard, you are not making an NBA All-Star game without at least a mediocre ability to shoot the basketball.
Again, as I said in the beginning, it is not like I am in love with Tyler Hansbrough’s NBA potential, nor am I convinced the Clippers are making a mistake with the Griffin selection. They both might be stars. They both might be solid role players, but not All-Stars (more likely). I am not sure. All I am saying is that the skill sets are pretty similar if you really look at them.
Basically, if you offered me even money that Blake Griffin would not make more NBA All-Star games than Tyler Hansbrough, I would quickly take that wager.
Tell me I’m crazy.
Ricky Rubio will make more All-Star games than both combined.
I’d take Griffin. I have nothing to base my argument on other than he’s a man and Hansbrough is kind of
annoying in a typical Duke player way (yes i know he went to unc).
Seriously, Rubio? There are probably 3-5 point guards I’d take over him. Hope the Sixers get Ty Lawson.
“Crazy” might be overstating it, but I definitely disagree. All of this stuff about collegiate success can pretty much be thrown out. How are
JJ Redick and Adam Morrison as NBA players? Obviously, Hansbrough is a very different type player, but Redick was also a national player of the year
from the ACC. Basketball pedigree can be thrown out too. I’ll give the edge in “motor” to Hansbrough, but take a look at an NBA All-Star roster and what do you see more of, guys with a great motor, or guys with freakish athleticism? A motor makes you a role player in the NBA, not an All-Star. The biggest edge for Hansbrough is probably his jump shot, but it’s not like he’s a great mid-range jump shooter. He’s capable. The one and only question with Griffin is probably how he’ll develop a jump shot. Either way, I’m pretty confident that Hansbrough will never play in an NBA All-Star game and with Griffin’s HUGE edge in athleticism and quickness, I don’t think you can say their skill sets are that similar.
Pretty! This has been an extremely wonderful article.
Thanks for providing this information.
It’s an remarkable paragraph for all the web people; they will get benefit from it I am
sure.
Hi to every one, the contents existing at this site are really awesome for people knowledge, well, keep up the good work fellows.