Well, we are now less than two hours away from the tip-off of the most important game for USA Basketball since the Original Dream Team. (On a totally unrelated note, I am only working a half-day today.)
Anyway, I know that there is a good chance that I may be proven crazy on this one, but here is my hypothesis: This year’s “Redeem Team” is BETTER than the Original Dream Team, making it the best basketball team ever assembled. Hold on one second and allow me to make a couple of points before you rip me apart for this.
1). I would never, EVER claim that if you take the players on the ’92 team in their prime against the players on this team in their prime, that this team is better. A big part of this argument will rest on the fact that guys like Bird and Magic were far past their peak years. I mean Magic was retired.
2). I will also not claim that the run that that the ’08 team is having through the Olympics even compares to the run through the Olympics that the ’92 team had. Yes, the Dream Team opened the Olympics with a 116-48 win over Angola. They cruised through the Olympics with a 9-0 record and an average victory margin of 44 points per game. Their closest game was the gold medal game against Croatia, where they won by a measly 33 points. They only trailed once in the entire tournament, and Coach Chuck Daly did not need one timeout in any of the nine games.
![]()
3). I have trouble believing that the Redeem Team would win a one-game, winner-take-all game between the two, even as they were constructed because the ’92 team had guys like Jordan, Barkley, Bird, and others that just would not lose. However, I still think that this year’s team is better–meaning that if the two teams played the same 100-game schedule the ’08 team would have more wins, and even if the two teams played each other 100 times, the ’08 team would win the majority of them.
Why? Let us start with personnel. I think that this team is considerably more athletic (remember, Magic, Bird, and Drexler were all in the back-ends of their careers). I think that this team is very well-constructed, in that they have a high-octane backcourt, with a lot of depth at the point (Paul & Williams off the bench), and they teamed that up with extremely athletic big men (Howard, Bosh, and Boozer). Secondly, and this may come as a bit of a surprise, I think that this team plays better defense than that team did–particularly at the point and transistion, full-c
ourt defense. Finally, I think that this team has even more scoring options than the ’92 team, which featured 10 of the 50 greatest players of all-time. I still have absolutely no idea how anyone could possibly figure out how to stop this team on offense. Not only do they have absolutely incredible scorers (LeBron, Kobe, Carmelo, Wade, etc.), but they all pass very, very well, so these phenomenal scorers all get good looks. Then, you can bring a dead-eye shooter (Michael Redd) off the bench or let the offense run through a pair of point guards, who are not too shabby at scoring the ball either (Paul & Williams). Yes, they lack the back-to-the-basket scorer, but they are proving that that facet of the game is not as important in the up-and-down international game.
Finally, let us just look at results. Yes, as I stated above, the Dream Team won 9 straight by an average of 44 points per game. Yes, I know that they only trailed one time (25-23 in the first quarter of the gold medal game against Croatia, which they won by 33). But, I think it is inarguable that the level of play in these Olympics is astronomically better than it was in 1992. I am not saying that the Dream Team would not win gold if they were to play in 2008, but I think they would struggle–and this team is not. At least, so far.
Tell me I’m crazy…
Stage Two: Anger
For example, if you talk to any of the 1993 Phillies about “season momentum,” they will probably all mention things like the miracle comeback against the Giants, the Mariano Duncan grand slam off of Lee Arthur Smith on Memorial Day, the Milt Thompson catch in San Diego, and the infamous Mitch Williams game-winning hit at 4:41 in the morning. And, all of these things will be mentioned in the context of spurring on the team, building character, and setting the table for the wonderful season that was ahead of them. Well, 15 years later, if this Phillies team is going to provide magical memories for today’s 14-year olds like the 1993 team did for me at 14, a reference to last night’s game against the Mets might just appear on a Phillies blog in 2023.
were made with the next three hitters, starting with the signature play of the whole comeback. With the bases loaded and nobody out, down by 3, Carlos Ruiz hit a high chopper over the mound, where Jose Reyes barehanded it and tried to run to the bag for the force at second. However, Reyes must have misjudged just who was running from first, as Victorino, one of the fastest players in all of baseball (and who always gets a great jump and runs hard) beat Reyes to the bag–safe all-around. Still down two, however, the Phillies went to light-hitting reserve outfielder, So Taguchi with the game on the line. Taguchi fought off several nasty two-strike pitches before delivering the big hit–a game-tying double over the head of Endy Chavez in rightfield (which also got new Phillie starter, Joe Blanton, off the hook for the loss). Jimmy Rollins delivered the third consecutive memory of the inning, as he laced a double down the line, giving the Phillies a 7-5 lead (adding another on a botched double-play back to the mound), which would be more than enough for Brad Lidge to nail it down.
They did not really give up that much for him. The Phillies unloaded three prospects to the A’s, with the best being an A-ball secondbaseman Adrian Cardenas. Cardenas was a sandwich pick in the 2006 draft and was drafted as trade bait from the very beginning, considering the Phillies are pretty comfortable with their secondbase situation in the foreseeable future. They also gave up their 2007 third-round pick, Matthew Spencer (an outfielder in A-ball) and their 2005 10th round pick, Josh Outman (a left-handed relief pitcher in AA). Outman will probably reach the bigs, but does not project to anything more than a specialist left-hander, and Spencer has a decent “upside” and has a chance to reach the bigs, but is only currently hitting .249 at Clearwater. So, in the grand scheme of things, I do not think that the Phillies will be looking back on this trade and kicking themselves about the guys that they gave up.
Randy Wolf — I love Randy Wolf, trust me, I do. He was a warrior throughout his time here and I think he is a very good pitcher. However, I think it is clear that Wolf is much more comfortable on the West Coast–not because he is soft or sensitive, but just because that is where his family is and that is where he wants to be. For this reason, Wolf is probably a bit of a “rental,” and personally, I do not think he is good enough to “rent.”
A.J. Burnett — I am actually bigger on Burnett than many people, as far as what he could bring to the Phillies for this year. Plus, I do not think that it would cost all that much, in terms of prospects, for us to get him. If he was on a one-year deal OR a long-term contract, then I would probably say “Go get him.” However, he is on neither (or both). Burnett has a player option for the next two years on his contract at over $13 million per year. That means that if Burnett comes here and pitches well, he opts out and the Phillies cannot afford him. But, if he comes over and struggles or gets hurt, he stays on the books for two years. That is bad for the Phillies. Still, I would like to see what he can do here because I think his stuff speaks for itself.
Joe Blanton — Yes, his numbers kind of stink this year. Yes, the A’s are incredible at taking prospects from teams that amount to stars. So, yes, I am terrified to trade with Billy Beane for a bad pitcher. However, I think Blanton has great stuff and may just need the ole “change of scenery.” He only makes $3.8 million this year and is arbitration-eligible for the next two years, so this could be a move for ’09 and ’10 also. I do not think it would take either of the Phillies two best prospects to get him, either. So, I say, take a shot at Blanton.
Erik Bedard — Let me state the following first: Erik Bedard has proven, on multiple occasions that he has no heart and no onions. Living in Baltimore, I have heard countless stories from angry, impassioned fans talking about how Bedard would ask out of games and just simply refuse to put it up for his teammates. That scares the crap out of me. BUT…he is really, really good. It is not often that you can acquire a guy of that caliber at all, let alone for about sixty cents on the dollar, which is all it would seem to take to pry him out of a bad situation in Seattle. The Phillies NEED a pitcher, and Bedard is one of the most talented pitchers on the planet. Go get him!
In an era of opinions that change as the wind blows, and that old saying of “15 minutes of fame” becoming more and more literal, there is really something to be said for a guy who has broadcast the championship of a sport for three and a half decades. Packer is probably as good as it gets when it comes to in-game basketball analysis, and would probably make a better coach than most people who are currently paid to do so. So, it would be pretty safe to say that the ending of the career of a guy who is has been the best at what he does for the entire span of my lifetime would cause me some sadness and influence me to “pay my respects” to a great career. Or, at the very least, have my mind wax sentimentally about all the great Final Four games that Packer has called…all the memories.
Now, all of the above incidents were basketball-related and can, therefore, be forgiven and chalked up to a man who just thinks he is infallible when it comes to his trade–not a positive quality, but far from exposing a serious personality flaw in the man. However, there are several incidents through Packer’s career that may give display to the fact that not only is Packer arrogant and condescending about basketball, but he is probably a cruel, possibly even bigoted individual.